A chance to show the Netroots cares about workers 16 November, 2006
Posted by Zack in labor.add a comment
Go here and send a message or make a call:
http://ufcwaction.org/campaign/workers_walk_out
The country’s largest hog slaughter factory — not a nice place to work, but the only job in town. The workers have just walked out after a long struggle with management for better conditions and respect on the job.
From the workers’ site:
ALERT! Workers Walk Out of Smithfield Plant
Smithfield workers need your help NOW!
As we speak, workers at Smithfield’s plant in Tar Heel, N.C., are walking out of the plant in a spontaneous protest against Smithfield’s abuse and intimidation after the company retaliated against workers standing up for their rights and demanding a voice on the job.
Please, help spread the word and demand Justice at Smithfield right now by sending a letter to Smithfield Chairman of the Board Joseph Luter III and Smithfield CEO C. Larry Pope, demanding them to stop the intimidation and abuse in the Tar Heel plant. You can also call the plant directly to express support for the workers by demanding an end to the abuse without retaliation against workers.
We must show Smithfield that the whole world is watching and we will not tolerate its abuse and intimidation against workers.
- Smithfield must respect the rights of workers!
- Smithfield must stop the abuse in Tar Heel!
- Smithfield Must not Retaliate!
Your support RIGHT NOW is greatly needed! Please tell everyone you know to contact Smithfield and stand up for the rights of workers.
Contact Smithfield’s Tar Heel plant by phone: 757-365-3000 or 888-366-6767 or send the email letter below!
foo bar roots 16 November, 2006
Posted by Zack in Web2.0Schmeb2.0.1 comment so far
Dear Barcampers,
We’ve capped attendance at RootsCampDC but are still accepting anyone who worked on the elections this cycle. In other words, we’re committing a Barcamp sin by setting criteria for attendance. We made the mistake of saying “invite only” somewhere, and a couple of my Barcamper friends got very angry at me until I gave them a full explanation (and they’re still very unsettled by this deviation from the model). So I wanted to take some time to explain what we did and why we did it.
After growing in days to 100 people, we took the decision to close RootsCampDC except to people who had worked on the elections — in any role or capacity, with any organization or just on their own. It is not invite only — anyone can still sign up to attend. If they fit the criteria, they’re welcome up to our space limit of ~200. If they don’t fit that criteria, but really want to come, we’ll consider making exceptions.
We didn’t take this decision to favor “the elite” but rather to save places for the “unimportant” people who never factor into post election debriefs. When Buzz built up around RootsCampDC, we had a flood of “important” DC-based people signing up, but almost no ground-level election workers and volunteers. Why? Mainly because they were too busy trying to win their elections! Happily, since November 7 we’ve been getting those folks in — but there wouldn’t have been any space left if we hadn’t saved room for them.
From the start, RootsCampDC has had a special mission: to put the “bottom” in the same room with the “top” of progressive electoral politics in order to improve our campaigns. RootsCampDC was supposed to be an answer to the typical DC post-election debrief where executive directors talk to executive directors about what they think just happened. RootsCampDC was supposed to be a place where the volunteers and precinct organizers would analyze the elections together with directors, candidates and consultants as peers. We also wanted to bring in people who worked on the elections in new ways: bloggers, guerilla ad makers, programmers and others.
In other words, RootsCampDC was created to bring a lot of different kinds of people together. We hoped the group would come together naturally. Word spread and it almost worked. In DC circles it took off. A lot of “important” people, big brains and people who run things signed up — which was great, because they are half of the equation. But then a stampede started.
The problem was that the event was going to fill up and almost no campaign staff or volunteers were signing up. It was the last couple weeks of the election and those folks were just too busy to do anything but knock on doors. Many were too broke to consider last minute travel, so a wait list was not an answer. And most were so far outside of Web 2.0 culture (“Wiki…what?”) that they wrote off all the “camp” and “bar” stuff as just some more DC madness.
So, we were on course to holding a debrief exactly like the ones we were trying to replace.
There’s my explanation. If you’re a Barcamper and you’re still upset about this decision, my appeal is that trying to hold all camps to one rigid model isn’t very bar at all. We are trying this tweak to the model in order to save room for the ones who are always excluded — not to make an invite-only event for the elite.
If you’re still angry — let me try an analogy out on you. At any Barcamp, have the janitors from the cool Internet companies represented shown up? Of course not. And because Barcamp is about getting techies together, it’s not a problem. But RootsCamp is about getting ALL the different kinds of people together who make campaigns work: from the candidate to the campaign manager all the way “down” to the local office helper or precinct volunteer.
In the world of Democratic/progressive electoral politics, we’ve got a caste system — and RootsCampDC is trying to be something that busts it up. The people who are consistently (and passively) excluded from decision making circles and access to key jobs were not signing up for RootsCampDC precisely because they’re not in those elite circles based in DC. We took evasive action to fix the problem. It seems to have been the right thing to do so far.
Put press picts on your web site 15 November, 2006
Posted by Zack in Online organizing.add a comment
Kos gives some compelling graphic examples of why it’s so important for campaigns to put great picts on their websites for download from the press. (Though I have to say, I’d feel a little funny voting for the guy in the third one.)
He gives an example of a good press page here.
Learn how to do it even better in 2008 8 November, 2006
Posted by Zack in Online organizing.add a comment
The big story you’re not getting in the post-election coverage is that in 2006, Democrats finally came up with an answer to Karl Rove’s get-out-the-vote “72 Hour Program.” Rove built a volunteer-driven machine from the ground up, backed by the full unity of a ruling Republican Party. The Democrat’s answer was was much harder to come by. But this year, finally all cylinders were firing at once — and what an amazing sight it was to see:
- Individual campaigns took field seriously by hiring some brilliant young field directors early, and investing serious time and resources into volunteer-driven organizing.
- State parties began to act like functional organizations thanks to Howard Dean’s reconstruction effort of the last two years.
- The Democratic party and outside groups got serious about data and micro-targeting, and got it right.
- MoveOn.org ran a massive GOTV phone mobilization program that called several times the margin of victory in most key races.
- A legion of smaller grassroots organizations all over the country (for example, the League of Young Voters) ran innovative voter registration and GOTV programs.
- Local groups of activists, forged in the 2004 campaigns of Dean, Kerry and others, brought unprecedented strength to the elections — with big help from several national grassroots organizations, Democracy for America first among them.
- The fruit of consistent work by training organizations such as Campaign Corps and Wellstone Action paid off in big, visible ways this cycle.
- Blogs and others sources of netroots power fought smart and hard in hand-to-hand combat with local press and Republican campaigns. (Kos, MyDD, TPM — but so many others too!)
- Politicians — like John Kerry, Maria Cantwell, and Bill Nelson — replicated the MoveOn/ActBlue fundraising slate model and raised millions for their colleagues. (MoveOn and ActBlue raised tens of millions directly for candidates — up to a third of total revenue for some candidates, miraculously closing the money gap with the Republicans.)
- And Democrats would have nothing to celebrate today if it wasn’t for the quiet bedrocks that they take for granted but which influence far more votes that everything else combined: the sophisticated and powerful AFL-CIO GOTV program; EMILY’s List’s deep pipeline of talented candidates; African-American base vote operations all over America — to name a few.
But look: with all that we did together, we still only just squeaked through. In 2008 — assuming another batch of Republican pedophiles don’t surface the week before the election — we’re going to have a much harder campaign. We’ve got to get better. We’ve got to refine what we just did. We’ve got to learn from each other, improve our systems and make two-year plans that start now for winning it all in 2008.
Here are some events where we can do that together as a movement. If you played a role in the 2006 elections, then you’re invited:
San Francisco. November 11-12
New York. November 18
Bloomington, IN. November 17-18
Columbus, OH. December 15
Washington, DC. December 2-3
These events (with the exception of DC — see below for details) are free and open to all progressives who participated in the 2004 or 2006 elections — or even those who plan on being a part of 2008. These are “open space” conferences that allow all participants to hold sessions about their speciality, to present findings, tell stories, or important questions. You attend only the sessions that interest you — and there is plenty of time for learning to take place in hallway conversations.
I suggested this idea to some colleagues a couple months ago and the idea has really gathered steam, with the New Organizing Instutute and Emerging Progressives taking the lead in organizing. I got the idea after attending a thing called “Foo Camp,” which is an important and fascinating gathering in the world of cutting edge Internet start ups (don’t ask me how I got invited). What makes the gathering so interesting is that people in all sorts of positions are free to learn all sorts of things directly from each other. In one session I attended, Amazon.com founder Jeff Besos was sitting to my left and a 16 year old hacker was sitting to my right. An MIT Engineering PhD student was teaching us, and 20 other people about some insane things none of us had ever thought about. The weekend was an endless flow of one fascinating conversation after another. Multi-billion dollar businesses and important non-profits have been born at this gathering over the few years it’s been going.
When I left, it occurred to me we really need something like that in politics — and also something like the open and decentralized gathering that spun off from Foo Camp (called “Bar Camp“…long story!). Bar Camps have been organized around the world, getting together similar kinds of groups everywhere from Austin, Texas to New Delhi to Shanghai.
Our Washington DC Roots Camps already has attracted an amazing mix of top political leaders as well as young (and young at heart) innovators from all levels of all kinds of organizations. Because of overwhelming interest, we’ve had to make the DC event invite-only. We did that to ensure places for a representative group of people who really distinguished themselves in the work they did in this cycle — and that includes everyone from candidates and campaign managers all the way “down” to local volunteers. The DC event is designed to be a unique opportunity for people at the “top” to learn from rock stars at the “bottom” of the campaign world — and, of course, visa versa.
After every election there are many debriefs and evaluations. But normally everyone present is from only the top couple of layers of leadership. The purpose of these unique debriefs is to bring together innovators from all levels of the election.
At RootsCamp, Tom McMahon, the executive director of the DNC, will be sitting alongside Democratic Party star precinct captains. Eli Pariser, the director of MoveOn.org, will be sitting along side star phone captains from MoveOn’s Call for Change Program. The people working on Dean’s DNC Voter File project and on the private voter file effort will be in the same room! Ned Lamont hasn’t confirmed yet, but I’m going to personally remind him that I reserved nedlamont.com for him two days after he announced he was running and hopefully that’ll get him. We all experience these campaigns from totally different perspectives. Roots camp is the place to get ourselves together to figure out how to do it better for ’08.
All sorts of wonderful, creative madness is going to take place at Roots Camp. So get yourself there: All you have to do is sign up at the links above.